![]() LibreWolf is to Firefox what Ungoogled-Chromium is to Chrome. UPDATE January 2022: old review kinda sucked, I'm rewriting it. This one especially in light of the recent happenings at Mozilla. Packages for most distros are also not provided (archive) (MozArchive), so you'll have to compile. UPDATE: it's fucking August 2020, and the latest release of IceCat is still version 60.7 compared toįirefox 79. All in all, IceCat fixes many Firefox issues but leaves more of them in - and it can't be otherwise since theyĪre fully dependent on Mozilla's decisions in the end. like the shitty UI, resource usage (actually, it only takes 120MB RAM, much less than other FF forks - probably because of the old version), lack of configuration, deprecated addons etc. Though it is made by more ethical people, this browser still suffers from many of Firefox' ills Some privacy addons are included by default (as well as the annoying LibreJS), but you should still use uMatrix - though newbies might like having some privacy built-in. Older versions had some spyware in there, but 60.2 removed all of it as far as I can see. GNU IceCatįirefox fork from the Free Software Foundation. Firefox requires GTK3, just like all its forks. And all the browsers downstream from Firefox are also infected by extension. Many other issues could be stated in the same way. For example, the fact that they removed options several times means they will keep doing that down the road, and the browser will eventually become barebones. You never want to use software from an evil corporation because the evil spills into the code. Someone might wonder why any of this drama matters - but it is actually very important. I doubt any Firefox based browsers will survive this apocalypse, to be honest. Incarnate, they were always controlled opposition). I suspect this is preparation for ceding control of the web browsing ecosystem to Google soon (as predicted in Mozilla - Devil ![]() As if it wasn't already obvious earlier, they have now thrown out 250 people mostly working on technical stuff such as their Lethal virus and battling systemic racism. August 2020 update: Mozilla has now clearly ceased caring about technology (archive) (MozArchive), but is instead fully focusing on social issues - From combatting a Add to that the resource usage (~240MB RAM with one empty tab almost twice that of Chrome based browsers and more than twice than that Pale Moon) and shitty UI and you have a browser you're never going to want to use. Include removing configuration options, having anti-privacy default search engines, lying about being privacy-based (archive) (MozArchive), removingĪddon compatibility, disrespecting contributors, shoving you targeted advertisements, enforcing usage of certain other software, and many, many others (read the article!). There is a long history of anti-user decisions with this one - it's so big I've written a massive article about it and other Mozilla's sins. Let's analyze them one by one: Firefox based browsers Mozilla Firefox These consist of usability, privacy, customizability, philosophy, respect for the user, Slight exception in Pale Moon), we will have to use some other criteria to judge these browsers. Since they all support the same addons (with So, for a day-to-day browser, you have only two options: Firefox based and Chrome based. One advantage of these niche browsers is that they don't spy on you, but what I've learned from trying probably all of them is that, in the end, addons areĮssential - especially uMatrix is irreplaceable. Qutebrowser is a keyboard controlled browser that recently added per-domain settings, but they are inferior to uMatrix. No addon support (so far, though it's planned). Otter Browser is a promising project with a very nice UI, but has Midori has everything you'd expectįrom a modern web browser and even includes in-built functionality to replace some of the common addons, but it's not enough. Surf is a graphical web browser that has image and Javascript support, but no tabs or an actual user interface. I could mention many other browsers here. Or no Javascript support, limited CSS support, no loading of non-HTML content such as videos (but can load externally), and no addons make these unsuitable for modern day browsing. ![]() Missing in "modern" web browsers (such as editing cookies, custom stylesheets or keybinding), but in the end, they can all be got back through addons. Actually, elinks supports features that are somehow The basic terminal browser - links, w3m, Lynx, elinks - can still be used today to display websites only in text. What is the point of a web browser? Originally, it was to be able to read HTML documents, but since then, the Web has changed massively, and modern browsers need
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |